Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Evidence of a Creator

A Thought:




Watching a Nova special on the “beginnings of humanity”, talking about the evolution of man from chimpanzees. The fossil record is blank for 500,000 critical years – essentially there is a “missing link” in the evolutionary chain. Yet scientists are finding rocks deemed “tools” during this missing era, and are assuming that THIS is when “apes became human”. How do they know they’re tools, and not just odd-shaped rocks? “The way we know this is a tool instead of just a rock is because it was broken in a very particular way…. There is a method behind how this rock was broken into a tool, and it is not a random method.” This made me go “HMMMMM” big time. Don’t many of us look at the world in much the same way, in order to come to the conclusion that it has a Creator? That we see order, and perfection, and balance, and know that this could not have been “random”? Science will make the assumption that a rock was fashioned into a tool by a “creator” based on it’s deliberateness, but refuses to acknowledge the same argument in regards to the creation of our Earth.

No comments: